
Finn Haug sin vakre Klein Adroit fixie!
En fixed gear sykkel (fastnav) er en sykkel hvor drevet bak er skrudd fast på navet uten frihjulsnav. Så lenge hjulet går rundt går også kranken rundt og omvendt. En fixed gear sykkel kan også sykles baklengs...
“Knee pain is the most common lower-extremity overuse problem in cyclists. (7,8) In one recreational long-distance bicycling tour, 65% of all riders reported knee pain. (9) Another study (10) of more than 500 recreational cyclists indicated that almost 42% of all riders experienced overuse knee pain. While major problems such as fractures, dislocations, and ligament ruptures usually occur only after major trauma, overuse injuries are much more common….
“Gearing is a method of overcoming resistance that allows the cyclist to pedal comfortably at a uniform cadence to improve pedaling efficiency. Higher gears result in higher resistance, and lower gearing provides less resistance….
“Chondromalacia, characterized by pain…, is described as a grating sensation… that worsens with climbing, squatting, or prolonged sitting…. During cycling, the pain is precipitated by riding up hills or when the rider pushes higher gears with a slow pedal cadence.
The citations referenced above are:
7. Holmes JC, Pruitt AL, Whalen NJ: Lower extremity overuse in bicycling. Clin Sports Med 1994;13(1):187-205
8. Holmes JC, Pruitt AL, Whalen NJ: Lower extremity overuse in bicycling. Clin Sports Med 1994;13(1):187-205
9. Dannenberg AL, Needle S, Mullady D, et al: Predictors of injury among 1638 riders in a recreational long-distance bicycle tour: Cycle Across Maryland. Am J Sports Med 1996;24(6):747-753
10. Wilber CA, Holland GJ, Madison RE, et al: An epidemiological analysis of overuse injuries among recreational cyclists. Int J Sports Med 1995;16(3):201-206
“…patellofemoral syndrome, is the most common cycling injury, accounting for around 25% of all cycling problems (‘The biomechanics of cycling,’ In: Holloszy JO, ed., Exercise and Sports Science Reviews, Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; pp. 127-167 1991).
“…Training factors linked with patellofemoral pain include hill training, cycling with high gears at a low cadence, and a sudden increase in training volume.”
“One of the most common of these conditions is chondromalacia patella. This affects the rear of the kneecap. In healthy knees, the rear of the kneecap is smooth in order to allow it to glide across the other bones which make up the knee joint. In chondromalacia, excessive contact pressure between the kneecap and the knee joint over time causes this smooth surface to break down. As the condition progresses there is often an increase in knee pain, especially in forceful extensions of the knee during activities like climbing stairs–or pushing big gears at low cadence.
Gearing choices can become an important variable in preventing the progression of chondromalacia patella. When the leg is forcefully extended, as during a cyclist’s power stoke, the knee cap acts as a pulley to transfer the large forces of the quads across the knee joint to the tibia (one of the lower leg bones). As a result, a component of the tendon forces pulls the knee towards the knee joint, greatly increasing the pressure on the back of the kneecap. This pressure can wear down the joint surfaces. Normally, a thin layer of slippery fluid lubricates the joint and prevents wear. However, during slow, forceful extensions (think big chainring grinding uphill) this fluid becomes displaced and the joint loses much of its lubrication. This is not good for your knees or pistons!
Keeping a higher cadence will help to reduce the pressure of the knee cap against the knee joint, allowing the lubricating fluid to remain between the joint surfaces where it belongs, and so lessening the risk of joint surface breakdown. Cadences above 80rpm are generally better for your joints than knee-mashing 60 rpm cadences. Remember to choose your gear inches wisely and take into consideration the terrain and your ability to power your gear to maintain a relatively high cadence.”
“…Biomechanical abnormalities of the patellofemoral complex (the knee cap, the
femur, and their associated muscle and connective tissues), in conjunction with
strenuous training, are believed to be responsible for most cases of chronic
knee pain in cyclists.
“…As the cartilage breaks down, extra pressure is
then put on the bones which come together at the knee joint, producing bone pain
and inflammation.
“…note that these conservative and traditional
treatments only decrease symptoms temporarily. If you have patellofemoral pain
and ‘cure’ yourself with rest and ice – and then return to the kind of training
you were carrying out before the pain arose, in most cases the discomfort will
come right back again. In one study of conservative patellofemoral-pain
treatment which included a long follow-up, it was found that only 30% of
patients remained symptom free after 12 months (’Management of chondromalacia
patellae: a long term solution,’ Aust J Physiother, vol. 32(4), pp. 215-222,
1986). The reason for this, of course, is that the rest, ice, drugs, and
ultrasound do not correct the biomechanical deficiency or lack of strength which
is actually creating the problem….Cycling techniques which decrease
patellofemoral joint-reaction forces should be emphasised, at least at first;
these include spinning, using low rather than high gears, and (as mentioned)
avoiding excessive amounts of hill training.”
“… Changing the direction of pedaling alters the relative contributions that the
different muscles make to the activity.
“When pedalling backwards,
compared to forward pedalling, the quadriceps are even more active relative to
the hamstrings (Refs 2 & 6). This increased quadriceps activity puts even
greater stress on the patellofemoral joint ….”
Citations referenced
above are:
2. Bressel, E. (2001) Influence of ergometer pedaling direction
on peak patellofemoral joint forces. Clin Biomech 16(5):431-437.
6. Neptune,
R.R. & Kautz, S.A. (2000) Knee joint loading in forward versus backward
pedaling: Implications for rehabilitation strategies. Clin Biomech
15(7):528-535.
“…new research carried out by R. Neptune and S. Kautz at the Palo Alto Health
Care System in Palo Alto, California, reveals that backward pedalling may indeed
be useful for individuals with certain knee disorders – but is contradicted in
other cases (‘Knee joint loading in forward versus backward pedalling:
implications for rehabilitation strategies,’ Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), Aug;
Volume 15(7), pp. 528-35, 2000). When they quantified tibiofemoral and
patellofemoral joint-reaction forces, Neptune and Kautz found that lower
tibiofemoral compressive loads – but higher patellofemoral compressive loads –
were observed in backward pedalling, compared with normal cycling.
“…reverse cycling can actually produce greater compressive forces
between the patella and tibia, compared with normal cycling….”
